Definition of open source

Russell Nelson nelson at
Sun Nov 7 01:33:15 UTC 2004

Alan Rihm writes:
 > I was simply asking that we discuss the possibility of a different
 > licensing model since the current one does not address our specific
 > business requirements.

Excellent idea, but talk about it elsewhere.  Create a Yahoo Group and
announce it (once) here.  Discussing the creation of licenses which
intend to violate the Open Source Definition is *definitely*
off-charter for this list.

--My blog is at  | Violence never solves
Crynwr sells support for free software  | PGPok | problems, it just changes
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 212-202-2318 voice | them into more subtle
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  | FWD# 404529 via VOIP  | problems.

More information about the License-discuss mailing list