certification mark for "mirbsdksh"?
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Mon Nov 1 13:09:43 UTC 2004
Thorsten Glaser scripsit:
> - a wording variant of the 2-clause BSD licence:
> Copyright (c) 2002 Marc Espie.
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> are met:
> 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
> documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
> THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE OPENBSD PROJECT AND CONTRIBUTORS
> ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE OPENBSD
> PROJECT OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
This license is obviously Open Source (and Free, and Fair) and should be
fast-tracked by OSI.
> - the generated autoconf'd script:
> Copyright (C) 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 2004
> Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> This configure script is free software; the Free Software Foundation
> gives unlimited permission to copy, distribute and modify it.
This license is also obviously Open Source (and Free, and Fair) and should
be fast-tracked by OSI.
> - the manual page has an original 3-clause BSD licence
> by the University (with the advertising clause removed)
This is the current BSD license, and is already approved by OSI.
"No, John. I want formats that are actually John Cowan
useful, rather than over-featured megaliths that http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
address all questions by piling on ridiculous http://www.reutershealth.com
internal links in forms which are hideously jcowan at reutershealth.com
over-complex." --Simon St. Laurent on xml-dev
More information about the License-discuss