Why "open-source" means "free to distribute"?
jcowan at reutershealth.com
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Thu May 6 22:27:10 UTC 2004
Guilherme C. Hazan scripsit:
> But GlueCode's license is OSI-certified and their license is clearly
> distribution-limited:
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm
Simple. Their license is *not* OSI certified and they are misusing the logo
under false pretenses. (Their proprietary product includes open-source
components, but that's of course not enough.)
> So, what's the magic here?
Have our lawyer send a cease-and-desist letter.
--
You let them out again, Old Man Willow! John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of? You should not be waking! jcowan at reutershealth.com
Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep! www.reutershealth.com
Bombadil is talking. www.ccil.org/~cowan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list