Why "open-source" means "free to distribute"?

[jcowan at reutershealth.com]

Guilherme C. Hazan scripsit:

> But GlueCode's license is OSI-certified and their license is clearly
> distribution-limited:
> http://www.gluecode.com/website/html/prod_licensing.htm

Simple.  Their license is *not* OSI certified and they are misusing the logo
under false pretenses.  (Their proprietary product includes open-source
components, but that's of course not enough.)

> So, what's the magic here?

Have our lawyer send a cease-and-desist letter.

-- 
You let them out again, Old Man Willow!                 John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of?  You should not be waking!   jcowan at reutershealth.com
Eat earth!  Dig deep!  Drink water!  Go to sleep!       www.reutershealth.com
Bombadil is talking.                                    www.ccil.org/~cowan
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3