Dual licensing

[Marius Amado Alves]

> You might want to consider a proper dual license rather than your semi-open
> license.

This is one thing we're considering, yes.

> The AFPL which is not an OSI-certified license might fit the bill for
> the "open" part: http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/doc/cvs/Public.htm, since it
> limits commercial use. On the other hand, downstream sharing could be
> accomplished with Freenet's Fairshare scheme (as opposed to a seperate
> license): http://freenetproject.org/index.php?page=fairshare.

We'll check these references. Thanks a lot.


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3