Dual licensing

[Marius Amado Alves]

>> You said "provided free of charge."
>>
>> The GPL says "licensed free of charge."
>>
>> See the difference?
> 
> 
> Not really, but duh to myself. I should know better. Maybe it will come 
> to me in my sleep. Thanks.  (Myself)

It didn't come in my sleep. Perhaps someone can explain it to me. If the 
disclaimer were for the license itself, I'd understand, but no, it's 
explicitly for the program. And you cannot distribute the program 
without a license attached. So where's the difference, except in words? 
Thanks.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3