apache license 2.0 for consideration
cowan at ccil.org
Thu Feb 19 03:10:25 UTC 2004
Roy T. Fielding scripsit:
> "Code incorporating patents, when the code and contributors' patents are
> licensed solely under the MIT license, cannot be incorporated into a
> derivative work distributed under GPLv2, because any recipient who
> receives a copy of such a derivative work has no rights to use any of
> the patents incorporated into the original MIT code."
> Why, then, is the MIT license compatible with the GPL?
Because the MIT license is silent about patents; in and of itself,
it can't do anything to require you to breach the GPL's licensing
terms. (It may be that the word "use" provides an implied patent
license.) A specific MIT-licensed program may be GPL-incompatible,
but MIT-licensed programs as a class are not, because they don't
impose any requirements incompatible with the GPL's.
Where the wombat has walked, John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
it will inevitably walk again. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss