FOR APPROVAL: OZPLB Licence

[Bjorn Reese]

Russell Nelson wrote:

>Similarly, you can point at all the standard licenses (BSD, GPL, LGPL)
>and find flaws in them.  For you, it's the disclaimer.  For other
>people it's the presence of any disclaimer at all.  And yet most
>projects are licensed under one of these three licenses, and good it
>is too.
>  
>
If there are flaws in the existing licenses, then that seems like a 
perfectly
good reason to introduce a new license, especially since open source knows
no national boundaries.

PS: I am concerned about the growing hostility towards license submissions
that has been witnessed here lately.