For Approval: Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL)

[Mitchell Baker]

Mitchell Baker wrote:

> I would think that if there is to be a recommended list, one might  
> think that a trial period for a license -- to see how it is received, 
> whether it has unknown issues or other surprises -- might be a good 
> step before including it.
>
> Mitchell
>
> John Cowan wrote:
>
>>Mitchell Baker scripsit:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>I couldn't help but not the recommendation at the end to use this as a
>>>recommended license in place of the MPL.
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>Please note that as far as I know the OSI has no such list of recommended
>>licenses.  If they ever do compile one and approve it officially, I think
>>that this license deserves to be on it, that's all.
>>
>>  
>>