For Approval: Open Source Software Alliance License
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Sun Sep 28 17:09:26 UTC 2003
David Presotto scripsit:
> As an aside, it might have been less inflamatory if the license has said ``if
> source of the program and any derivatives is distributed under an inheritive
> license (e.g. GPL), it must ALSO be distributed under this license.''
> Then Sean would always have access to changed code for his proprietary works
> if anyone has access to them. Someone must have suggested this already but
> I don't see it in the archive.
No, no one has, and I think this is quite a clever idea. It's appropriate
to apply it to derivative works only, not to to distributions of
Sean, what do you think?
Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
-- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun" jcowan at reutershealth.com
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss