For Approval: Public Security Interrest "PSI" License

[James Michael DuPont]

--- Wolfram Kleff <xenonfs at users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> With GPL it would be no problem to distribute such stuff and the
> author(s) 
> have no chance to prevent such distribution!
> Please consider that the PSI license is intended for high-security
> and 
> critical software, not for "normal" software.

Dear Wolfram, 

this sounds like what I am proposing with an alternative solution
http://fsedu.org/fsedu.pl?ContentDelivery

I dont think that you are right about the GPL, I think you are looking
to copyright for a solution for an EULA.

You need a stronger agreement to bind all the networked users to single
agreed on version of the software for the duration of the transation
and a means to audit that software.

The gpl is fine for what it does, trying to make that a stronger
contract is dangerous.

at least in my opinion, I am not a lawyer.
mike


=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3