For Approval: The Wilhelm Svenselius Open Source License version 1.0
Mário Amado Alves
maa at liacc.up.pt
Tue Sep 2 12:54:54 UTC 2003
John Cowan wrote:
> Wilhelm Svenselius scripsit:
> > 6. Products derived from or containing any part of the
> Software must
> > be licensed as a whole at NO CHARGE to all third parties under the
> > terms of this license.
> The trouble with this clause is that it makes it doubtful
> whether the software can be put on CD-ROMs that are sold.
> Otherwise, the license looks fine. But it doesn't seem to do
> anything that the GPL doesn't do, or (more to the point) the
> OSL version 2.
Actually this very clause 6 is stronger than GPL w.r.t. charging. GPL
does not in principle forbids charging.
The GPL in practice seems to prevent changing. A big open issue as you
know. See the "Open Source Business Found Parasitic" discussions here.
See also www.softdevelcoop.org and references therein. And I think the
OSL would equal the GPL here.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss