OSD#5 needs a patch?

[Lawrence E. Rosen]

Chuck Swiger wrote:
> In particular, I'd disagree 
> with the "field of endeavor" clause if it is to be applied to 
> exclude software 
> under a "free source but no-commercial-redistribution" 
> license from being 
> OSD-compliant.

Such licenses are not OSD-compliant.  They've been repeatedly rejected.

/Larry Rosen

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3