For approval: ENCUL

[David Presotto]

>> In any event, as people generally look to OSI as owning the "Open
>> Source" term, I would think that if a company claims something is Open
>> Source where OSI says it's not, then that company would get lots of
>> horrible publicity and be widely viewed as being dishonest.
>
>Would that it were so.  AT&T has been calling Plan 9 "open source" for
>some time.

Actually, its Lucent these days that calls it that.  ATT doesn't
have anything to do with it; you should sully us instead.  We
(Lucent) have submitted for approval a license that we hope OSI will
accept and will rerelease Plan 9 under that should it ever happen.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3