Language question

[John Cowan]

Mark Rafn scripsit:

> I presume you're talking about section 12.5 (all your modifications are
> belong to us).  I don't think this is open-source compatible (there's no 
> way for someone to fork a version that doesn't give you special rights).

The same is true of the Netscape Public License, and while it's not a
fair software license, it *is* an open source license.

-- 
You are a child of the universe no less         John Cowan
than the trees and all other acyclic            http://www.reutershealth.com
graphs; you have a right to be here.            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
  --DeXiderata by Sean McGrath                  jcowan at reutershealth.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3