Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL

[John Cowan]

Rod Dixon scripsit:
> 
> You are both wrong. The designation of whether one license is incompatible
> with the GPL says nothing about "violation." On FSF's website, they
> designate some licenses as incompatible with the GPL. The question raised
> was why the AFL is included in that list.

It is whether the of creating a work that is derivative from two other works,
W licensed under license Alpha, and X licensed under the GPL, is lawful
that determines whether or not Alpha is incompatible with the GPL.

-- 
Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.  Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!  Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
  -- Joyce, _Ulysses_, "Oxen of the Sun"       jcowan at reutershealth.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3