Must publish vs. must supply

[David Johnson]

On Wednesday 12 March 2003 01:34 pm, Abe Kornelis wrote:

>        I'll stress my point one last time (you're bored stiff
> already, I don't doubt) I would offer the recipients of my software
> three choices:
>        1) make no modifications.
>        2) make mods and keep them private
>        3) make mods and publish to the public, either by publishing
>            yourself or by passing a copy of the modifications to me.

That's was not what I understood the term "must-publish" to be. 
Certainly your definition is acceptable, non-onerous, and obviously 
Free. Many OSS and FS licenses already have these provisions.

-- 
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3