Must publish vs. must supply
David Johnson
david at usermode.org
Thu Mar 13 02:30:12 UTC 2003
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 01:34 pm, Abe Kornelis wrote:
> I'll stress my point one last time (you're bored stiff
> already, I don't doubt) I would offer the recipients of my software
> three choices:
> 1) make no modifications.
> 2) make mods and keep them private
> 3) make mods and publish to the public, either by publishing
> yourself or by passing a copy of the modifications to me.
That's was not what I understood the term "must-publish" to be.
Certainly your definition is acceptable, non-onerous, and obviously
Free. Many OSS and FS licenses already have these provisions.
--
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list