Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL
Lawrence E. Rosen
lrosen at rosenlaw.com
Thu Mar 13 02:28:17 UTC 2003
> It's not you, the AFL copyright holder, who can choose not to
> care. It's Jimmy Q. Gplauthor, whose copyright is infringed
> by having a derivative work (the GPL+AFL code) distributed
> under more restrictive terms than the GPL.
Huh? Is Jimmy == Person A, Person B or Person C? Keep your parties
straight. I challenge you to find any copyright infringement in
anything I suggested!!!!
/Larry
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list