Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL

[Lawrence E. Rosen]

Andy Tai wrote:
> So the "AFL" no longer applies to the derived work, is
> that what you are saying?
> 
> So I can do whatever I want with my derived work, from
> a "AFL" work, licensing my derived work in any terms I
> want, and people using the derived work will not be 
> bound by conditions of the "AFL" but by my terms only?

Not quite.  The derived work is bound by the conditions of your license,
and the portions relating to the AFL work are bound by the AFL too.

/Larry Rosen

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3