Compatibility of the AFL with the GPL
John Cowan
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Wed Mar 12 21:04:16 UTC 2003
Alex Russell scripsit:
> So long as your license terms do not contradict the license you received the
> original work under (the AFL), this is my understanding of the situation.
Well, "contradict" is fuzzy. It can be licensed under terms that are
completely different from the AFL's: for example, it can be issued under a
proprietary license.
--
Winter: MIT, John Cowan
Keio, INRIA, jcowan at reutershealth.com
Issue lots of Drafts. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
So much more to understand! http://www.reutershealth.com
Might simplicity return? (A "tanka", or extended haiku)
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list