A BSD-like license that isn't template-based

[David Johnson]

On Tuesday 04 March 2003 01:10 pm, Dave H wrote:

> Finally, I've attempted to draft a new license, below, based as much
> as possible on the BSD license.  It is also slightly influenced by
> the AFL. (Note: IANAL.)  I'd appreciate any constructive thoughts on
> how good or bad it is compared to a regular BSD-like license, etc.

Why do you feel that there is a need for a non-template BSD-like 
license? Is there a problem with the current templatized licenses I am 
not aware of?

If you need to simply refer to a license by name instead of including 
the full text, simply say "This software is copyright blah blah blah. 
See the file LICENSE for complete license and copyright information".

-- 
David Johnson
___________________
http://www.usermode.org
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3