GPL compatibility of a simple license

[Assert]

Hello,

Thank you very much for the quick replies, that was helpful :-)
I will wait for the approval of the original author...

Assert.

Karsten M. Self wrote:

>Clause 5 would read far more clearly if "FREEWARE" were defined.
>
>I'd say the terms for distribution are ambiguous, and would avoid the
>work.
>
>If you're interested in distributing the work, contact the author and
>express your wish that licensing terms be clarified.  GNU GPL, GNU LGPL,
>BSD, and MIT/X11 are all examples of GPL-compatible licenses.
>
>IANAL, TINLA, YADA.
>
>Peace.
>
>  
>


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3