license idea (revised)

Ryo Chijiiwa ryo at
Wed Jul 16 21:13:01 UTC 2003

On 7/16/2003, "Mark Rafn" <dagon at> wrote:

>On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Andy Tai wrote:
>> Maybe you are looking for is the AGPL,
>I don't see this on the list, and I hope not to. Debian has
>expressed objections to this license as well.
>IMO, this is not a free software license.

Their FAQ ( mentions that the license
"should" be compatible with GPL 3.0, and may be used as a replacement.
 However, I haven't found any information on GPL 3.0 anywhere, so I
have no idea about the validity of their claims.

Perhaps someone here would know?

license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list