Why?

[Rick Moen]

Quoting Alex Rousskov (rousskov at measurement-factory.com):

> I believe the context implies that such a declaration is believed to
> be legally effective. 

You can believe that, but, from inquiries so far, it is not clear
Creative Common does.  The matter, indeed, appears to occasion some
controversy.

> Again, by the very nature of legal law, no case and no set of cases
> can guarantee a single interpretation of the current law or that the
> current law will not change (sometimes retroactively!).

Clearly.  To review:  I was answering the assertion that open-source
licensing has never been tested in court.

-- 
Cheers,           find / -user your -name base -print | xargs chown us:us
Rick Moen
rick at linuxmafia.com
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3