Variant of IBM Public License

Adrian Cho adrian at diadic.com
Wed Apr 30 20:17:41 UTC 2003


Why not just use the Common Public License.  It's a generic version of the
IBM Public License.

Adrian

> > I've been working with our legal department and they suggest taking
> > the IBM
> > public license, changing the "IBM" to "NVIDIA" and changing the state
> > from
> > "New York" to "Delaware," and modifying the year of the copyright.
>
> Hmm I see an equation in the future. The reluctance to object to a
> (lesser accepted) license is inversely proportional to how much geeks
> want to get their hands on the licensed code.  Or something like that.
>
>
> Steve Mallett - Imagineer
> http://OSDir.com on the O'Reilly Network | steve at osdir.com
> http://opensource.org | webmaster at opensource.org
> http://EmergentReport.com <news blog>
> http://emergentreport.com/dj <personal blog>
>
> "Don't hate the media, become the media."
> -Jello Biafra
>
> --
> license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



More information about the License-discuss mailing list