Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application Server)

[Robert Samuel White]

I agree with you, Lewis.  That is selfish of me to say you cannot sell
my free software.

I'll take that out of the license right now.

I still want to see my license approved because I think there is a need
for it.  I think it would even serve the needs of Henry Piffers, who
just asked a question on the list with similar concerns that I had.

I think the Simplified Artistic License serves the needs of the artists
who want a simple yet effective open source license.

I don't mean to create controversy and I am just going to let this go.
I suppose it's not important that my license be approved by OSI.  I just
wanted it to be because I *do* support open source software, but I
suppose me offering my software for free didn't show you that.






--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3