Plan 9 license
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Fri Nov 1 18:55:25 UTC 2002
Ralph Mellor scripsit:
> It turns out that this license is still *NOT* OSD compliant,
> ie. it is not what those running the OSI would label "Open
Could you please specify wherein the Plan 9 license fails of Open
Sourceness in its current incarnation? The complaints of RMS at
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/plan-nine.html seem to apply with equal
force to the Perl license (which he calls unFree) and the OSL 1.0,
with the exception of the termination-on-any-IP-lawsuit provision.
I assume that the Lucida fonts could be treated as severable.
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
Charles li reis, nostre emperesdre magnes,
Set anz totz pleinz ad ested in Espagnes.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss