Something between Public Domain and LGPL?

[Karsten M. Self]

on Tue, Mar 19, 2002, Asko Kauppi (Asko.Kauppi at fi.flextronics.com) wrote:
> 
> Hi, license freaks! :)
> 
> I'm having some problem finding my way through the Open Source lincense
> jungle. I do understand GPL and LGPL but would need something that also
> allows statical linking to proprietary applications. What would you
> recommend?

A BSD/MIT style license does this, though your interest in the GPL /
LGPL licenses may indicate terms of BSD/MIT aren't acceptable.
Alternatively, there are various dual-licensing schemes you might care
to look at.

Remember that as the author of a work, you don't need to seek
permissions from another party to publish it.  However, if you
incorporate others' works in your own, you're bound by their terms.

IANAL, TINLA, YADA.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>      http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?          
   Keep software free.         Oppose the CBDTPA.         Kill S.2048 dead. 
           http://www.eff.org/alerts/20020322_eff_cbdtpa_alert.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20020325/7df1cb9c/attachment.sig>