OSD modification regarding what license can require of user

[Emiliano]

Russell Nelson wrote:

>  > Has A violated the license? That would seem weird, because it pertains
>  > clear written instructions (even if those instructions are in fact a
>  > shell script). And since B didn't agree to anything, he isn't bound by
>  > the 'click-wrap' license.
>
> The dragon attacks:
>
> Ask your lawyer to include terms in the license that prohibit
> disclosure of the unpacking method.  The license will also have to
> prohibit distribution of the enclosed tarball.

I don't have a lwyer, and frankly, I'm loathe to hire one just so I can
release my sources to the public. If an existing license covers my
needs, excellent, but if not, I simply won't be releasing it. Not that
the world would collapse without access to my software, but I still
think it's a shame.

Emile

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3