OSD modification regarding what license can require of

[Forrest J. Cavalier III]

Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:

> We have never removed OSI approval for any license, 

APSL 1.0

> so I'm sure that
> the GPL is in no danger of not being an Open Source license.

You are the tail trying to wag the dog, Russ.

If the OSD can't accept the GPLv2, then the only plausible
conclusion is that the OSD is wrong.  Plain and simple, that.

We can't make any conclusions about GPLv3, since we
haven't seen the details.

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3