request for approval of APOSSL

[Matthew C. Weigel]

On Wednesday, March 6, 2002, at 12:43 p, dave sag wrote:

> I get the idea that you feel that there should be as few OSSLs as 
> possible and are acting more as a review board than an 
> accreditation board.

We are neither.  We are a discussion board.

The discussion tends towards, "another!?!?"

>   Surely a licence conforms to the OSD or it does not.  Whether 
> there is matter in the licence that is outside of the scope of the 
> OSD would seem to me to be irrelevant to the veracity of the 
> licence.

This just makes a stronger case that we are being jerked around.

weigel at libcom.com

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3