UnitedLinux and "open source"

[Bjorn Reese]

Andy Tai wrote:
> 
> "Free software" means a well defined set of software.

Yes, to most English-speaking people it means software that
is free of cost (i.e. gratis).

> Whatever you define is not relevant, if it is not
> compatible with the well accepted meanings of the
> community.

Following your own line of argumentation, whatever the
community defines is not relevant, it it is not compatible
with the well accepted meanings of the English-speaking
population.
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3