UnitedLinux and "open source"

[John Cowan]

Sam Barnett-Cormack scripsit:

> It's not the fact that they aren't freely distributing binaries themselves,
> it's that there seems to be an implication that they are restricting other
> people from distributing them, both a) those that they bought (presumably)
> from UnitedLinux, and b) those they compiled themselves without branding.

I read UL's claims as forbidding (a) but not (b).

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3