Approval request for BXAPL

[Forrest J. Cavalier III]

> > The definition of "User" is too broad.  It allows any
> > Distributor to force someone to be a "User" simply by
> > sending them a copy.
> 
> But does it arm any part of the license ? Or just a personal feeling ?
> 


8.5 seems to have an effect for "Users"  15 may also.
16 also, but 16 is hard to follow.

Realistically, I think no court will find you had obligations
if someone sent you a source without request.  But what if someone
obtains the source for determination if it infringes a patent?

Does the license allow them to inspect the software without 
obligating them to #16?  How?


--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3