discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer"

Mike Haisley mikehaisley at comcast.net
Tue Dec 10 03:03:57 UTC 2002


I am all for acceptance, it only makes since, that legacy licenses would
be accepted, I would also suggest the statement "This code is public
domain" would be allowed under the same category and judgment though.

-Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Dodson [mailto:bruce_dodson at hotmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:34 PM
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: Re: discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice
and Disclaimer"

So far, no discussion.  Is that a good thing or a bad thing?

http://www.geocities.com/brucedodson.rm/hist_pnd.htm

Regards,
Bruce

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dodson" <bruce_dodson at hotmail.com>
To: <license-discuss at opensource.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 12:11 AM
Subject: discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice and
Disclaimer"


> [ Please discuss this template.  It's a clever idea.  You'd have
> thought that someone would have thought of it before.  Bruce has
> sent a few changes since his submission.  Please consult his web page
> (URL at bottom) for the exact current submission.  -russ ]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3



More information about the License-discuss mailing list