discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer"
Mike Haisley
mikehaisley at comcast.net
Tue Dec 10 03:03:57 UTC 2002
I am all for acceptance, it only makes since, that legacy licenses would
be accepted, I would also suggest the statement "This code is public
domain" would be allowed under the same category and judgment though.
-Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Bruce Dodson [mailto:bruce_dodson at hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:34 PM
To: license-discuss at opensource.org
Subject: Re: discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice
and Disclaimer"
So far, no discussion. Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
http://www.geocities.com/brucedodson.rm/hist_pnd.htm
Regards,
Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Dodson" <bruce_dodson at hotmail.com>
To: <license-discuss at opensource.org>
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 12:11 AM
Subject: discuss: approval request: "Historical Permission Notice and
Disclaimer"
> [ Please discuss this template. It's a clever idea. You'd have
> thought that someone would have thought of it before. Bruce has
> sent a few changes since his submission. Please consult his web page
> (URL at bottom) for the exact current submission. -russ ]
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list