Are these licenses are complete or correct?

[Yale Wu]

hi, 
	I'm now trying to translate all the licenses proved by OSI and
listed in www.opensource.org/licenses/ into Chinese.
	I think it's a meaningful work because few people in China could 
understand these documents completely.
	But during my work, I found some licenses listed in opensource.org/licenses/ 
are not like themselves. For example, http://opensource.org/licenses/nokia.php and 
http://opensource.org/licenses/motosoto.php, the former seems losing some parts,
and latter seems having a redundant chunk of paragraph.
	And also there are some spelling mistakes, such as that->than... 
	Could anyone to tell me why things are like that? Are these licenses I mentioned 
above are really the same as they look like in opensource.org? 
	If off topic of this maillist, forgive me. :)
cheers
Yale Wu

--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3