discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application

John Cowan jcowan at reutershealth.com
Fri Aug 30 23:56:12 UTC 2002

Lawrence E. Rosen scripsit:
> eNetWizard may not be a registered trademark, but it certainly seems as
> if it is being used as a common law trademark -- and that's good enough
> to get protection.  /Larry Rosen

My understanding is that something can only be a trademark if it is
used in trade: things you give away do not count.

John Cowan   <jcowan at reutershealth.com>   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
"One time I called in to the central system and started working on a big
thick 'sed' and 'awk' heavy duty data bashing script.  One of the geologists
came by, looked over my shoulder and said 'Oh, that happens to me too.
Try hanging up and phoning in again.'"  --Beverly Erlebacher
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3

More information about the License-discuss mailing list