discuss: Modified Artistic License (eNetwizard Content Application

[John Cowan]

Colin Percival scripsit:

>    I may be wrong here, but isn't this covered by trademark, not copyright, 
> law?

Only if "eNetWizard" is in fact a trademark, which may not be the case.
Even if one is not "in trade", one may wish to avoid confusion
between one's own software and someone else's.

-- 
John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>     http://www.reutershealth.com
I amar prestar aen, han mathon ne nen,    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
han mathon ne chae, a han noston ne 'wilith.  --Galadriel, _LOTR:FOTR_
--
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3