license name arrogance Re: Academic Free License
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Thu Aug 22 11:52:17 UTC 2002
Bjorn Reese scripsit:
> The only concern I have about the names is that Free and Open seems
> to be switched. The OSL is based on reciprocity, which is usually
> associated with Free Software, and the AFL is not, which is usually
> associated with Open Source (especially when seen in the light of
> RMS's rejection of Open Source.)
Software licensed under non-reciprocal licenses is still free software.
Software licensed under reciprocal licenses is still open-source software.
The number of licenses where FSF and OSI disagree is very small, and
the proportion of software covered by them is even smaller.
John Cowan jcowan at reutershealth.com http://www.reutershealth.com
"Mr. Lane, if you ever wish anything that I can do all you will have
to do will be to send me a telegram asking and it will be done."
"Mr. Hearst, if you ever get a telegram from me asking you to do
anything you can put the telegram down as a forgery."
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss