YAPL is bad (was: Re: Backlog assistance?)
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Mon Sep 24 23:16:12 UTC 2001
on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:47PM -0400, Matthew C. Weigel (weigel+ at pitt.edu) wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2001, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > This leads to a GPL-related issue which is not clear to me: can
> > redistribution of GPL code be constrained by an employment agreement?
> Well, that brings up the question of whether sharing within a
> corporation qualfies as "distribution," a question which I can't
> recall being answered (although it could just be my memory failing).
Conventional wisdom says it isn't. The FSF's guidelines, as I
understand, are that exchanges between individuals or units at a
company, for company business, does not constitute a distribution.
Allowing an engineer to take software home to work on it independently
does. Exchange between separate legal units (e.g.: corporations) does.
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Home of the brave
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ Land of the free
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss