Is inherited class a derivative work?
david at usermode.org
Thu Oct 25 01:53:51 UTC 2001
On Wednesday 24 October 2001 02:49 am, Michael Beck wrote:
> If you go to Altai v. CA (1992), "the Second Circuit designed its Altai
> test to deal with the fact that computer programs, copyrighted as "literary
> works," can be infringed by what is known as "nonliteral" copying, which
> is copying that is paraphrased or loosely paraphrased rather than word for
> word. [...] When faced with nonliteral-copying cases, courts must determine
> whether similarities are due merely to the fact that the two works share
> the same underlying idea or whether they instead indicate that the second
> author copied the first author's expression. The Second Circuit designed
> its Altai test to deal with this situation in the computer context,
> specifically with whether one computer program copied nonliteral expression
> from another program's code."
The key phrase above is "copying that is paraphrased or loosely paraphrased".
In some rare instances, a subclass could be considered a "paraphrase" of the
base class. But this is not the normal and typical use of inheritance. There
would be no use at all for inheritance if it were only a restatement of the
base class. Why use the subclass at all then? The most common reason for
using inheritance is to (in literary terms) "expand upon a theme."
I don't see how the Altai test applies to subclasses.
pgp public key on website
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss