cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Wed Oct 3 02:48:26 UTC 2001
Karsten M. Self scripsit:
> It's not clear whether or not condition 1 implies that all
> modifications and derived works must be freely distributable,
The MIT and BSD licenses make no such demand. GPL != Open Source.
> > Anyone could redistribute
> > the "official" source (but *not* modified source).
> This expressly violates condition 3.
Not. Licenses that only permit patch distribution can be Open Source.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
Please leave your values | Check your assumptions. In fact,
at the front desk. | check your assumptions at the door.
--sign in Paris hotel | --Miles Vorkosigan
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss