The Invisible Hand

David Johnson david at
Tue Oct 2 01:56:43 UTC 2001

On Monday 01 October 2001 17:00, Matthew C. Weigel wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
> > If you don't value freedom for its effects (admittedly a pragmatic
> > argument), why do you value it?
> On ethical grounds- it is not an effect, an incidence, of freedom, that
> I value.

To play Devil's Advocate: if there are no effects to freedom, wouldn't you be 
just as happy with a certificate saying "I'm free" as actually being free?

David Johnson
license-discuss archive is at

More information about the License-discuss mailing list