License backlog - OSI is making itself irrellevant
tiemann at redhat.com
Fri Aug 31 18:03:53 UTC 2001
Generally speaking, I agree with Russ. In this specific case, it does look
like Open Source to me. I recommend we vote on this at the next board meeting.
P.S. I could not attend the last board meeting due to multiple overlapping
commitments at LinuxWorld in SF -- sorry guys.
Russell Nelson wrote:
> Roger Browne writes:
> > We've been waiting for well over a year to have the Eiffel Forum License
> > considered. It's a very simple license that is obviously open source.
> The APSL was obviously open source. Just go <this> way through the mine
> field, my friend.
license-discuss archive is at http://crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3
More information about the License-discuss