X.Net, Inc. License
nelson at crynwr.com
Thu Aug 9 15:49:32 UTC 2001
Matthew C. Weigel writes:
> What would be an example? The popular "oops we didn't mean to include
> old revisions that make disparaging remarks" kind of markup? I'd think
> that it's what prints out that counts.
Right, that's my point. CR and LF are a form of markup which, when
properly rendered, are invisible.
> Is asking submissions to be in plaintext unacceptable?
Not unacceptable, but since we're going to publish the license in HTML
format, we want the license submitted in that format.
> > Nope. They want to specify jurisdiction, because they've had a
> > problem in the past with jurisdictions which aren't friendly to open
> > source. They didn't specify which one it was.
> My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
It's in process.
-russ nelson <sig at russnelson.com> http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315 268 1925 voice | All extremists should
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | +1 315 268 9201 FAX | be shot.
More information about the License-discuss