X.Net, Inc. License

[Karsten M. Self]

on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:19:20PM -0400, John Cowan (cowan at mercury.ccil.org) wrote:
> Matthew C. Weigel scripsit:
> 
> > My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> > approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
> 
> It should be noted for the record that such licenses are not GPL-compatible.

Why?  Because of the "no additional conditions" requirement?

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>          http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?             There is no K5 cabal
  http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/               http://www.kuro5hin.org
   Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA!    http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire                        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20010806/bb2b338c/attachment.sig>