X.Net, Inc. License
Karsten M. Self
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Mon Aug 6 21:46:51 UTC 2001
on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 01:19:20PM -0400, John Cowan (cowan at mercury.ccil.org) wrote:
> Matthew C. Weigel scripsit:
> > My opinion is that "MIT License with specified jurisdiction" should be
> > approved, as this seems like a valid concern.
> It should be noted for the record that such licenses are not GPL-compatible.
Why? Because of the "no additional conditions" requirement?
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal
Free Dmitry! Boycott Adobe! Repeal the DMCA! http://www.freesklyarov.org
Geek for Hire http://kmself.home.netcom.com/resume.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the License-discuss