Qt and the GPL

[kmself at ix.netcom.com]

No need to cc: me. I'm on the list.

On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 07:39:34AM -0400, Lou Grinzo wrote:
> This latest exchange points out one of the most troubling aspects of
> software licensing--even many of the people who care about such 
> issues and closely read the licenses can't always agree on exactly what
> is and isn't allowed.
> 
> In this case, I think it would help everyone a great deal if the FSF added 
> a page to their web site that simply enumerated all the combinations of
> ways to statically and dynamically link free and non-free software to
> create free and non-free software, and then indicate whether the GPL
> and LGPL allow or forbid it.  (A sentence or two of explanation might 
> also be a good idea, for some cases.)

You mean like:  http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/license-list.html ? 

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                    http://www.opensales.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?   Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/    K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20000905/5d6b6435/attachment.sig>