Qt and the GPL
kmself at ix.netcom.com
kmself at ix.netcom.com
Tue Sep 5 00:01:52 UTC 2000
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 03:35:22PM -0700, David Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, kmself at ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
> > > If there will be separate versions (and I hope there won't), then this
> > > will be the first time (that I am aware of) that a GPLd library will
> > > be available with an identical non-GPL version.
> >
> > Not quite. Apache has dualed Artistic and GPL licenses for some time.
My bad. I was thinking Perl, not Apache. Apache is BSD (advertising
clause).
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com> http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
Evangelist, Opensales, Inc. http://www.opensales.org
What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? Debian GNU/Linux rocks!
http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ K5: http://www.kuro5hin.org
GPG fingerprint: F932 8B25 5FDD 2528 D595 DC61 3847 889F 55F2 B9B0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20000904/4f493165/attachment.sig>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list