Linux 0.97 is under GPL, isn't it?

kmself at ix.netcom.com kmself at ix.netcom.com
Tue Oct 31 18:04:07 UTC 2000


on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 06:39:00PM +0100, Sven Dehmlow (sven_dehmlow at gmx.de) wrote:
> Hi,
> I develop a kernel basing on Linux 0.97, so I need to know which license it
> has.

Ask Linus.

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself at ix.netcom.com>     http://www.netcom.com/~kmself
 Evangelist, Opensales, Inc.                    http://www.opensales.org
  What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?      There is no K5 cabal
   http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/        http://www.kuro5hin.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20001031/c143ab24/attachment.sig>


More information about the License-discuss mailing list