Free documentation licenses

[John Cowan]

kmself at ix.netcom.com wrote:

> In the general case, if the documentation is to be freely
> redistributable to a large license, a license which allows distribution
> under terms at least as liberal as the software license should be
> sufficient.

Indeed, but that is a general point not specific to documentation.
It is commonplace for parts of a GPLed software package to be released under
newBSD/MIT.

-- 
There is / one art                   || John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
no more / no less                    || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things                   || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness                 \\ -- Piet Hein