prohibiting use that would result in death or personal injury
John Cowan
jcowan at reutershealth.com
Mon Jul 24 20:32:33 UTC 2000
Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> Are you sure in your jurisdiction that that applies to transactions
> without "consideration"?
Consideration is pretty much a matter of form, and a court can find consideration
almost anywhere. For example, clause 3 of the Apache license would certainly be
consideration: in exchange for the right to use Apache as part of your
software, you have to put the name of the Apache Foundation somewhere
(though not as an endorsement or promotion).
> In fact, keeping this in the
> realm of copyright law and *not* contract law may be the clincher - do you
> have any evidence of someone writing a book on some subject, then being
> sued (successfully) when using the information in that book led to some
> unfortunate situation?
No. But that won't save you if the court decides that software is for this
purpose more like a device (it does something) than a book (which just advises you
to do something). In that case, consumer products liability law cuts
in, and that is heavily weighted toward the injured consumer.
--
Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan at reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list